My Family Devotion

Mark 14:53-59

The Witnesses Could Not Agree

53They led Jesus away to the high priest, and all the chief priests, elders, and scribes assembled.

54Peter followed Him at a distance, right into the courtyard of the high priest. And he sat with the officers and warmed himself by the fire.

55Now the chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were seeking testimony against Jesus to put Him to death, but they did not find any.

56For many bore false witness against Jesus, but their testimony was inconsistent.

57Then some men stood up and testified falsely against Him:

58“We heard Him say, ‘I will destroy this man-made temple, and in three days I will build another that is made without hands.’”

59But even their testimony was inconsistent.

Berean Standard Bible

They take Jesus to the high priest, and the whole council gathers in the middle of the night: chief priests, elders, scribes, everybody who mattered. What follows has the furniture of a trial. It does not have the substance of one.

Before Mark gets to the hearing he puts one other man in the picture. Peter has followed him at a distance, all the way into the courtyard, and he is down there sitting with the officers and warming himself at the fire. Mark sets him by that fire and then leaves him alone while the night goes on upstairs.

Mark also does what a careful reporter does. He tells us what the council wanted before he tells us how the night went.

Now the chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were seeking testimony against Jesus to put Him to death, but they did not find any.

A court that already knows the sentence is not weighing anything. It is shopping. And the strange part of this particular shopping trip is how badly it goes, because they cannot get even a manufactured case to hold together.

For many bore false witness against Jesus, but their testimony was inconsistent.

The law is what gives that sentence its weight. Under Deuteronomy nobody goes to death on the word of one witness. A charge has to be established by two or three, and their accounts have to line up with each other. Liars who contradict themselves are worth no more to that court than an empty room.

Eventually some men stand up with the strongest thing anybody has. They quote him about the temple.

We heard Him say, "I will destroy this man-made temple, and in three days I will build another that is made without hands."

Mark has already shown his readers where that came from. Earlier in the week, with the disciples admiring the stonework, Jesus told them that not one stone of the temple would be left on another. He was describing what was going to happen to the building. He did not say he would pull it down with his own hands. So the best charge in the room is a real saying carried secondhand, distorted somewhere along the way, and repeated by men who were not there when he said it.

Mark writes the failure down a second time anyway. Even that testimony did not hold together. A council with its mind made up, a room full of willing witnesses, and after all of it no case at all, which is why the high priest is about to get up and put the question to Jesus himself.

How We Know

Verses 56 and 59 both say the testimony did not agree, and that detail matters because of a written requirement. Deuteronomy 17:6 says a man may be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses, and not on the testimony of one.

So agreement between witnesses was not a preference; without it the case could not proceed to a capital sentence.

That supports Mark reporting a real procedural problem rather than describing a generally unfair hearing, and it explains why the high priest questions Jesus directly in the next passage.

Questions

1 Think of a time you made up your mind about somebody before you knew much about them. What did you do with the facts that came in afterward?

AnswerMost of us keep the ones that fit and quietly find a reason to set the rest aside. It happens without any decision to be unfair, and it almost never feels dishonest while we are doing it.

2 What were the chief priests and the council after that night, and how does Mark let us know?

AnswerTestimony that would carry a death sentence. Mark says so before he describes a single moment of the hearing, so we watch the whole night knowing what it was for. They were not trying to find out whether he was guilty.

3 The witnesses kept contradicting each other. Why does that bring the whole thing to a stop?

AnswerBecause the law would not put a man to death on one voice. A charge had to be established by two witnesses or three, and their accounts had to agree. A room full of people saying different things leaves a court with nothing to sentence anybody on.

4 Somebody finally quotes Jesus about the temple. What is wrong with what they say he said?

AnswerJesus had said the temple was coming down, not that he would pull it down. He told the disciples that not one stone would be left on another, which describes what was coming rather than threatening it. The witnesses turned that into a boast and put words in his mouth.

What This Means for Us

The council was not trying to find out whether Jesus had done anything wrong. They had settled that, and the rest of the night was spent looking for material that would let them say it out loud.

Any of us can work that way. We do it with a passage we would rather not obey, and with a person we made our minds up about years ago. The reasons get collected afterward, to hold up a conclusion that was reached first.

There is a warning sign for it, and this passage hands it to us. When somebody keeps looking for witnesses and keeps disliking the ones who turn up, the trouble is usually not with the witnesses.

Prayer

Father, we can make our minds up first and go looking for reasons afterwards, and we often do it without knowing. Show us where we have done that with you. Give us the nerve to look straight at what is actually there. Amen.